The competition commission, as A2
students well know, is the body responsible for the regulation and upkeep of
strong competition in the world of business and economics. The commission
inquires and subsequently regulates firms that they believe have restricted
competition in respective markets. Their main target is to ensure that consumer
welfare is as high as is possible, so surely this can only work to your
advantage? Not quite I'm afraid.
Let’s look at the failed merger
between Ryanair and Aer Lingus.
Three times now Ryanair have
attempted to purchase the 71% of Aer Lingus, and three times the competition
commission have denied the latter company even the opportunity to accept or
decline. This is because the CC has reason to believe that such a takeover will
result in Ryanair decreasing the number of flights from the UK to Ireland. This
reduction in supply will equal an increase in price, and therefore lower
consumer welfare. Fair enough, but is this guaranteed to happen?
The market structure as it stands
is an Oligopoly, with several airlines offering cheap flights from the UK to
Ireland. If you were to merge two of these firms into one, it would become a
slightly more concentrated market but will remain an oligopoly none-the-less.
So Ryanair will have no justification to lower their flights on this path and
increase prices, as other airlines will easily be able to undercut them. So why
merge; to create economies of scale, and to lower dis-economies of scale. They
can easily do this through extra savings from buying the fuel in bulk, as
Ryanair will be taking on the fuel bill for Aer Lingus now so cost savings are
increased as quantity is also increased. Dis-economies of scale can now be
reduced through cutting staff that are now no longer needed. Managerial
positions within each company will clash and so many will find themselves out
of the job pretty quickly.
All of this cumulates into
massive savings for the company. Ryanair can either choose to keep these
profits, re-invest them in other ventures or to further consumer welfare, or
they could pass some of the savings onto the consumers themselves, making the
“lad’s holiday” you may be planning later on in the year a whole lot cheaper.
And to think the competition
commission are supposed to be working in our favour..
But let’s look at another
investigation of theirs that perhaps works in our favour.
Although only recently coming to
the surface, the takeover bid of Makro Holding Ltd by Booker Group PLC can have
a big effect on retailing and customer welfare. These Cash and Carries work as
localised monopolies, some on a bigger scale than others. Booker is the largest
wholesale retailer in the UK with revenues of over £3.5 billion in 2011, while
Makro’s revenue was barely scraping over the £1billion mark in 2009 when Booker
first enquired about a takeover.
These firms are able to supply
wholesale products in bulk at a cheap price to other smaller firms, which leads
to them selling these products on singularly at a greater price per unit. This
all works well because these wholesale companies are competing against Large
supermarket retailers who are also able to buy directly off producers of goods
in bulk. There is competition formed between supermarket retailers and
wholesalers in this instance. However a takeover from Booker will eliminate the
competition from Makro for them while they are reaping in the extra revenue
gained from this venture. The higher quantities will result in further savings
through economies of scale. This allows them to lower prices massively in their
warehouses throughout the country, and out-price any localised businesses. So
in the short-run, it’s great for consumers.
In the long run, it’s not so
good. With the barriers to entry being so high in this market, Booker will soon
find that they dominate and so can raise their prices again to gain supernormal
profit. “Bossman” will have no choice but to buy his stock from this
superpower, and you’ll soon find that your favourite can of diet cola has shot
up in price.
So at least we might have
something to thank the competition commission for, maybe it is looking out for
our own welfare?
No comments:
Post a Comment